So, the next assignment we got was to write an opposing argument on the last message we posted about destroying guitars, which you can read under. As you can read, I was for and see it as a possitive thing. This means that my task now is to see it completely from the other side: be against is and to see it as a negative thing.
The destruction of intruments when not done by accident is a waste of good intruments. It is probably done to express themselves and to create a certain immage, but still, that can be done in different ways as well. I also think that they are really showing off by doing this, because an instrument costs a lot of money and by destroying one they practicly say that they have enough money to but new ones after their concerts. Next to that it does not add a lot to their performances, it may only have shocked the audience of impressed them, but usually if someone really likes their music fireworks would have been enough. Their fans come for the music, not to see instruments being destroyed.
This is how I would have looked at it from the other perspective. I found this very hard to do, because I did not agree with what I was writing.
xx,
Stella
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten